Implementation of restorative justice in the termination of prosecution of crimes at the Tanjung Perak District attorney's office
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59651/relae.v17i1.269Keywords:
Prosecutors, Restorative Justice, Resolution ProceduresAbstract
The criminal justice system involves law enforcement agencies, including the police, prosecutors, courts, and correctional institutions. Many minor cases that should be resolved outside the courtroom must, due to existing legal constraints, go through litigation. The introduction of Restorative Justice policies is presented as an alternative, fairer way of resolving cases, focusing on rehabilitation. The aim of this study is to understand the role of prosecutors in resolving criminal cases through Restorative Justice and the procedures for resolving criminal cases through Restorative Justice at the Tanjung Perak District Attorney's Office. This research uses empirical legal research with a qualitative approach, gathering primary data through interviews and documentation, as well as secondary data from literature and relevant regulations. Data analysis is conducted descriptively and qualitatively to address the research issues. The findings show that prosecutors play a crucial role in the implementation of Restorative Justice, including providing counselling, assessing case eligibility, facilitating mediation, drafting agreements, monitoring implementation, and preparing reports in accordance with applicable regulations. The procedures for resolving criminal cases through Restorative Justice at the Tanjung Perak District Attorney's Office include case identification, mediation between the perpetrator and the victim, report preparation, and case termination based on the agreement.
References
Ali, T. M. (2023). PENGHENTIAN PENUNTUTAN TERHADAP SUATU PERKARA PIDANA .
Andriyanti, E. F. (t.t.). URGENSITAS IMPLEMENTASI RESTORATIVE JUSTICE DALAM HUKUM PIDANA INDONESIA.
Fadlian, A. (2020). PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA DALAM SUATU KERANGKA TEORITIS. Jurnal Hukum POSITUM, 5(2), 10–19.
Harefa, A., Mӧhӧ, H., Fakultas, F., Hukum, U., Nias, R., Kunci, K., Penyelesaian, :, Pidana, P., Justice, R., Negeri, K., & Selatan, N. (t.t.). Jurnal Education and development Institut Pendidikan Tapanuli Selatan Hal. 12(2), 557. https://doi.org/10.37081/ed.v12i2.6442
Jemmy, M., & Mahdianur, D. (2023). PENERAPAN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN DI KEJAKSAAAN NEGERI PADANG. 11.
Kejaksaan Tinggi Jawa Timur. (2022, November 30). Jaksa Agung ST Burhanuddin: Restorative Justice Menjadi Alternatif Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara. kejati-jatim.go.id. https://kejati-jatim.go.id/jaksa-agung-st-burhanuddin-restorative-justice-menjadi-alternatif-dalam-penyelesaian-perkara/
Makarewa, I. T., Antow, D. T., & Aling, D. F. (2021). ANALIS PENGHENTIAN PENYIDIKAN DAN PENUNTUTAN BERDASARKAN KUHAP.
Natalis, E. (2023). Mediasi Penal Dalam Perspektif Keadilan Restoratif Bagi Penyelesaian Kasus.
Oktavira, B. A. (2023, Januari 26). Mengenal Unsur Tindak Pidana dan Syarat Pemenuhannya.www.hukumonline.com.https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/mengenal-unsur-tindak-pidana-dan-syarat-pemenuhannya-lt5236f79d8e4b4/
Ponglabba, C. S. R. (2017). Tinjauan Yuridis Penyertaan Dalam Tindak Pidana Menurut KUHP.
Putri, R. P. (2019). PENGERTIAN DAN FUNGSI PEMAHAMAN TINDAK PIDANA DALAM PENEGAKAN HUKUM DI INDONESIA RIANDA PRIMA PUTRI. Ensiklopedia Social Review, 1(2). http://jurnal.ensiklopediaku.org
Risnawati Br Ginting, Ediwarman, Edi Yunara, & Marlina. (2023). Penghentian Penuntutan Melalui Penerapan Restorative Justice di Tingkat Kejaksaan.
Suprianto, A., & Handayati, N. (2024). PENERAPAN RESTORATIF JUSTICE PADA TAHAP PENYIDIKAN TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA. Dalam Jurnal Penelitian Ilmiah Multidisiplin (Vol. 8, Nomor 12).
Tampoli, D. Ch. M. (2016). PENGHENTIAN PENUNTUTAN PERKARA PIDANA OLEH JAKSA BERDASARKAN HUKUM ACARA PIDANA.
Tasane, S. I., Ucuk, Y., Subekti, & Widodo, E. (2024). PENERAPAN KEADILAN RESTORATIF PADA TINDAK PIDANA.
Utoyo, M., Afriani, K., Dosen, H., & Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda, S. (2020). SENGAJA DAN TIDAK SENGAJA DALAM HUKUM PIDANA INDONESIA. 7, 75–85. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4291791
Zaman, I. F. (2023, Maret 14). Perbedaan Pidana Umum dan Pidana Khusus. pinterhukum.or.id. https://pinterhukum.or.id/perbedaan-pidana-umum-dan-pidana-khusus/.
