Effect of manure and compound npk fertilizer application on the growth and yield of peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.) In Siwalubanua II Village Gunungsitoli Idanoi District
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59651/cceria.v20i4.482Keywords:
Growth, NPK 16:16:16 fertilizer, Peanuts, Pig manure, ProductivityAbstract
Peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.) are a nutritious and economically valuable food crop; however, their productivity in Indonesia, including the Nias Islands, remains low, necessitating proper soil fertility management and the provision of appropriate nutrients. This study aimed to determine the effects of pig manure and compound NPK fertilizer, as well as their interaction, on the growth and yield of peanuts in Siwalubanua II Village, Gunungsitoli Idanoi District. The study employed a factorial randomized block design (RBD) with two factors: pig manure treatments K0 (no fertilizer), K1 (3 kg/plot), K2 (4 kg/plot), and K3 (5 kg/plot), as well as NPK 16:16:16: N0 (no fertilizer), N1 (22 g/m²/application), and N2 (32 g/m²/application), with three replicates. The observed parameters included plant height, number of branches, flowering age, number of pods per sample, fresh weight of pods per sample, and fresh weight of pods per plot. The data were analyzed using ANOVA and the BNJ test at the 5% level. The results showed that pig manure and NPK 16:16:16 produced different responses for each parameter. K3 (5 kg/plot) yielded the highest values for plant height at 2–3 MST, number of branches at 2 and 5 MST, earlier flowering, and fresh pod weight per sample. K2 (4 kg/plot) produced the highest plant height at 4–5 MST, the highest number of branches at 3–4 MST, the highest number of pods per sample, and the highest fresh pod weight per plot. N2 (32 g/m²) produced the highest numerical values for most parameters. The interaction between the two factors did not have a significant effect in some early observations but began to have a significant to highly significant effect in subsequent observations and on several yield components. The K3N2 combination produced the highest numerical values for several parameters but was not always significantly different from other treatment combinations based on the 5% BNJ test.
References
Asis, Ramlan, M., Ismail, M., Pakpahan, L. E., Sutarni, & Abdurahman. (2022). Improving Peanut Growth and Productivity in Dryland Fields Through the Application of Dolomite and NPK Fertilizer. Indonesian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 24(2), 88–94. https://doi.org/10.31186/jipi.24.2.88-94
Astuti, D. T., Sebayang, N. S., Abdi, Z., & Hajimah. (2022). Effects of Manure and SP-36 Fertilizer on the Growth of Peanut Plants (Arachis hypogaea L.). Journal of Agroecotechnology in the Humid Tropics, 5, 65–71. https://doi.org/10.35941/jatl.5.1.2022.8019.65-71
Betiol, O., Edwin, C., & Michelotto, M. D. (2023). Conservation agriculture practices in a peanut cropping system: Effects on pod yield and soil penetration resistance. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Do Solo, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.36783/18069657rbcs20230004
BPS, Food Crops and Horticulture Agency of North Sumatra Province (2023), Harvested Area, Production, and Average Peanut Production by Regency/City (2023). Accessed via online series: https://sumut.bps.go.id
Darmasandi, A. P., Lubis, I., & Purnamawati, H. (2025). Morphophysiological and production responses of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) ‘Takar 2’ to organic, biological, and NPK fertilizers. Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia, 53 https://doi.org/10.24831/jai.v53i1.62880
Febri, V. B., Syafrani, & Endriani. (2026). Enhancement of Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Growth and Yield through the Interaction of Cattle Manure and Phonska NPK Fertilizer in Red-Yellow Podzolic Soil. Agricultural Dynamics, 42(1), 46–53. https://doi.org/10.25299/dp.2026.vol42(1).27375
Hapsoh, Dini, I. R., & Muttakin, A. (2023). The Effects of Organic Matter, Cellulolytic Microorganisms, and NPK Fertilizer on the Growth and Yield of Peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.). Agrium Journal, 20(3), 194–203. https://doi.org/10.29103/agrium.v20i3.12836
Hodiyah, I., & Milati, P. A. (2022). The Effect of Rhizobium spp. Inoculation and Vermicompost on Root Nodule Formation and Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Yield. Media Pertanian, 7(2), 101–111. https://doi.org/10.37058/mp.v7i2.5811
Homer, T., Soekamto, M. H., & Maruapey, A. (2024). Growth and yield of groundnuts (Arachis hypogaea L.) in response to goat manure compost application. Journal of Agricultural Science, 12 (April), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.30743/agr.v12i1.9470
Juliawati, Jauhari, & Puryani, I. (2024). The Effect of Phosphate and Potassium Fertilizer Rates on the Growth and Yield of Peanuts (Arachis hypogeae L.). Agrida: Journal of Agricultural Science, 4(1), 8–13. https://doi.org//10.5516/agrida.v4i1.813
Lica, A., Alibas, S. F., Permadi, A., Annisa, F., Putri, N. Y., Afila, A., Zakinah, N., & Budi, I. (2025). Compost production from manure and wood chips at the West Sulawesi University Greenhouse as a means of imparting knowledge to students. Tarreang Journal, 2(1), 33–38. https://doi.org/10.31605/jtarreang.v2i1.5893
Nugroho, A. F., Triyono, K., & Sumarmi. (2023). The Effect of Different Doses of Cattle Manure and NPK Fertilizer on the Growth and Yield of Peanuts (Arachis hypogaea (L.)) of the Kancil Variety., 19(2). Scientific Journal of Agriculture https://doi.org/10.31941/biofarm.v19i2
Purbajanti, E. D., Safitri, D., & Arafat, S. (2024). Increasing Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Productivity by Optimizing Nitrogen and Potassium Fertilization. International Journal of Plant and Soil Science, 36(10), 510–517. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2024/v36i105102
Putra, R. E., Rayes, M. L., Kurniawan, S., & Ustiatik, R. (2024). The Effect of a Combination of Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on Soil Physical and Chemical Properties and Rice Yield in Reclaimed Dryland Fields. Journal of Agriculture, 35(1), 136–150. https://doi.org/10.24198/agrikultura.v35i1.53686
Qibtiyah, M., Mahmudi, C. H., & Istiqomah. (2021). Growth and Yield Responses of Peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.) to Combined Fertilizer Applications and Planting Spacing. Agroradix, 4(2), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.52166/agroteknologi.v4i2.2593
Rahmadi, A. I., Wahyuni, S. H., & Friska, M. (2024). The Effect of NPK Fertilizer on Peanut Crop Production (Arachis hypogaea L.). Jurnal Agricultural Science, 19(2), 51–54. https://doi.org/10.58222/jas.v19i2.308
Ririn, Y., Pioh, D. D., & Nangoi, R. (2022). Effect of Pig Manure Incubation as Organic Fertilizer on the Growth of Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.). Journal of Applied Agrotechnology, 3(2), 470–477. https://doi.org/10.35791/jat.v3i2.44885
Riyansyah, D. A., Masnang, A., & Jannah, A. (2026). Nutrient Uptake and Yield of Peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.) under Different NPK Forms and Doses. Acta Solum, 2(2), 84–93. https://doi.org/10.20527/actasolum.v4i2.3570
Sidik, M., Saijo, & Hariyadi. (2025). Growth and Yield of Peanuts in Response to Chicken Manure and Potassium Fertilizer Treatments. Bioscientiae, 22. https://doi.org/10.20527/b.v22i2.16378
Suryaningtyas, D. T., Saputra, H., & Rosjidi, M. (2023). Release Pattern of Nitrogen and Potassium from Controlled-Release Fertilizer (CRF) in the Soil. Jurnal Trop Soils, 28(3), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.5400/jts.2023.v28i3.99-106
Tukan, H. D., Dalle, N. S., Nugraha, E. Y., Sikone, H. Y., Jeramat, A. A., Filma, D., & Sekar, V. K. (2024). Utilization of Pig Waste and Manure as Bokashi Fertilizer at the Puar Farm Farmers’ Group. Jurnal Masyarakat Mandiri, 8(4), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.31764/jmm.v8i4.24251
Vaclav, V., Ladislav, M., Lukas, H., Martin, H., Eduard, P., & Lubica, P. (2021). Soil Organic Matter in Relation to Soil Properties and Soil Inputs. Agronomy. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11040779
Wang, J., Zhai, Z., Xu, G., Zhang, R., Zhang, X., & Hu, R. (2024). Optimizing Sampling Points and Path Planning for Soil Monitoring in Agricultural Land. Agronomy. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy1412294
Yunanda, F., Soemeinaboedhy, I., & Silawibawa, I. P. (2022). The Effect of Various Organic Fertilizers on Soil Physical Properties, Soil Chemistry, and Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Production in Kediri District., 1(3), 294–303. Student Scientific Journal https://doi.org/10.29303/jima.v1i3.2148
