Perspective on regulation of caning in the preparation of the criminal law code (KUHP) in the future
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59651/relae.v14i1.73Keywords:
Criminal, Absolute Law, Criminal LawAbstract
This writing aims to understand the reality of norms regarding the regulation of caning in qanuns or local regulations in the Province of Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam, then to explain how the weaknesses and advantages of regulation of caning as positive law, then to examine the perspective of regulation of caning in the Book of Laws Penal Code (KUHP) in the future as one type of alternative punishment that can be imposed by judges. As for the formal criminal law, it is regulated in the provisions of the Governor of Aceh Regulation Number 10 of 2005 concerning Technical Instructions for Implementation of the Caning Law. This caning punishment is felt to be able to deter the convict because it creates a greater embarrassment effect, resocializes the convict in society and is expected to be able to reduce the crime rate. Caning is a type of punishment that is physically painful. The emergence of many cons regarding its existence because the punishment of caning is considered to tend to degrade human dignity and it is everyone's right to be free from torture. Article 1 paragraph (3) provides a strong legal basis for unwritten laws that live in society regarding the application of customary criminal law. This is solely to fulfill the sense of justice that lives in a certain society. Whereas Article 1 paragraph (4) places caning as a source of material law. So the judge has the authority to multiply the laws that live in society and pass a criminal sentence based on his convictions.
References
Abdurrahman al-Maliki, Sistem Sanksi Dalam Islam, Pustaka Thariqul Izzah Bogor, 2002.
Adami Chazawi, Stelsel Pidana Indonesia, Biro Konsutasi & Bantuan Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, 1999.
Al Qur’an dan Terjemahannya, Departemen Agama RI, 2002.
Barda Nawawi Arief, Sistem Dalam Ketentuan Umum Konsep RUU KUHP 2004, Bahan Sosialisasi RUU KUHP 2004, diselenggarakan oleh
crossmap news, Nofem Dini, Kepala Paroki Aceh: Hukum Cambuk Harus Tidak Berlaku Untuk Umat Kristen, 27 Juni 2005.
Departemen Hukum dan HAM, tanggal 23-24 Maret 2005, di Hotel Sahid Jakarta.
ELSAM (Lembaga Studi Dan Advokasi Masyarakat), Pemidanaan, Pidana Dan Tindakan – Position Paper Advokasi RUU KUHP Seri # 3, ELSAM, Jakarta, 2005.
Eskol-net, Augustinus Simanjuntak, Artikel Lepas : Antara Hukum Cambuk Dan Hukum Nasional, 11 Juli 2005.
Harian Kompas, Teuku Kemal Fasya, Hukum Cambuk Dan Keadilan, 25 Juni 2005.
Harian Umum Sore Sinar Harapan, Murizal Hamzah, Menelisik Hukum Cambuk di Serambi Mekkah, Banda Aceh.
Media, Nadirsyah Hosen (dosen Fakultas Syariah UIN Syarif Hidayatullah – Jakarta), KUHP Dan Syariat Islam.
Moeljatno, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta, 1993.
Mohammad Daud Ali, Hukum Islam – Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Dan tata Hukum Islam Di Indonesia, PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, cet. ketujuh, 1999.
Niniek Suparni, Eksistensi Pidana Denda Dalam Sistem Pidana Dan Pemidanaan, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 1996.
Notula Sosialisasi Rancangan Undang-Undang tentang Kitab UndangUndang Hukum Pidana, diselenggarakan Direktorat Jenderal
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 32 Tahun 2004 tentang Pedoman Satuan Polisi Pamong Praja.
Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Departemen Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia R.I bekerjasama dengan Australian Government’s Legal Development Facility (LDF), Hotel Sahid, Jakarta, 23-24 Maret 2005.
Qanun Nomor 5 Tahun 2000 tentang Pelaksanaan Syariat Islam. Peraturan Gubernur Aceh Nomor 10 Tahun 2005 tentang Petunjuk Teknis Pelaksanaan Hukum Cambuk.
Rancangan Undang-Undang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (RUU KUHP) 2004
Roeslan Saleh, Stelsel Pidana Indonesia, Bina Aksara, Jakarta, 1987.
Sayyid Sabiq, Fikih Sunnah 9, PT. Al Ma’arif, Bandung, 1997.
Soerjono Soekanto, Penelitian Hukum Normatif, PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2003. , Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Universitas Indonesia Press, Jakarta, 1986.
Sudarto, Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana, Alumni, Bandung, 1981. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP).
Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 1995 tentang Pemasyarakatan.
Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia.
Undang-Undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2001 tentang Otonomi Khusus Bagi Propinsi Daerah Istimewa Aceh.
Undang-Undang Nomor 44 Tahun 1999 tentang Penyelenggaraan Keistimewaan Propinsi Daerah Istimewa Aceh.
www.hukumonline.com, Kontroversi Qanun, Perda Dengan Karakteristik Khusus, 7 Nopember 2005.
www.legalitas.org., Romli Atmasasmita (Guru Besar Hukum Pidana Internasional UNPAD), Aspek Perlindungan HAM dalam RUU KUHP.
www.legalitas.org., Wahiduddin Adams, Perbandingan Dan Hirearkhi Qanun, Perdasi, Perdasus dan Perda Dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional.
www.liputan6.com, Hukuman Cambuk Menjadi Titik Awal Penegakan Hukum, 25 Juni 2005.
www.parlemen.net, Muladi (Ketua Panitia Penyusunan RUU KUHP), Beberapa Catatan Tentang RUU KUHP, Jakarta, 21 Juli 2004.
www.republika.co.id., Fauzan Al-Anshari, Menyikapi Hukum Cambuk Di NAD, 15 Juli 2005.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Eko Rinawan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
