Analyzing minor theft resolution under Nias customary law: a legal pluralism perspective from South Nias
Keywords:
Customary Law, Dispute Resolution, Legal Pluralism, Minor Theft, Restorative JusticeAbstract
This study analyzes the resolution of minor theft cases under Nias customary law in Orahua Hili Village, South Nias Regency, from a legal pluralism perspective. The research aims to examine how customary dispute resolution mechanisms operate at the village level and how they interact with the formal legal system in Indonesia.This study employs an empirical juridical approach with a qualitative method. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with selected informants and supported by document analysis. The findings indicate that minor theft cases are resolved through a deliberative process known as orohu, which emphasizes consensus, social harmony, and restorative justice. From a legal pluralism perspective, this mechanism reflects the coexistence and interaction between customary and national legal systems. While customary law demonstrates effectiveness in terms of accessibility, efficiency, and community acceptance, challenges remain regarding legal certainty, procedural consistency, and potential bias in decision-making. This study contributes to legal scholarship by providing empirical insights into the functioning of customary law within a plural legal system and highlights its relevance in contemporary discussions on restorative justice and access to justice. The findings also suggest the need for better integration between customary and formal legal frameworks to enhance fairness and legal certainty.
References
Benda-Beckmann, F. von. (2019). Legal pluralism revisited: A critical appraisal. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 51(3), 345–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2019.1677225
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Daly, K. (2016). What is restorative justice? Fresh answers to a vexed question. Victims & Offenders, 11(1), 9–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2015.1107797
Fitriani, R. (2018). Penyelesaian tindak pidana ringan melalui pendekatan hukum adat. Jurnal Hukum IUS, 6(2), 120–132. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v6i2.561
Hernawan, A. (2020). Eksistensi hukum adat dalam sistem hukum nasional Indonesia. Jurnal Rechtsvinding, 9(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v9i1.400
Marbun, B. (2021). Penyelesaian tindak pidana ringan melalui pendekatan restorative justice di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 10(2), 155–170. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.10.2.2021.155-170
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Nasution, A. (2022). Legal pluralism in Indonesia: The position of customary law within the national legal system. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 17(2), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.30652/jih.v17i2.7890
OECD. (2019). Government at a glance 2019. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/8ccf5c38-en
Prabowo, A. (2023). Restorative justice policy in Indonesian criminal law reform. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 8(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v8i1.67890
Sihombing, E. (2021). The role of customary law in resolving community disputes in Indonesia. Jurnal Rechtsvinding, 10(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v10i1.789
Simanjuntak, R. (2020). Peran tokoh adat dalam penyelesaian konflik berbasis kearifan lokal. Jurnal Socius, 9(2), 88–102. https://doi.org/10.20527/js.v9i2.7654
UNODC. (2020). Handbook on restorative justice programmes (2nd ed.). United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. https://www.unodc.org
Wibowo, A. (2019). Penyelesaian perkara pidana melalui mekanisme non-litigasi di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 49(2), 300–315. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol49.no2.1912
World Bank. (2020). World development report 2020: Trading for development in the age of global value chains. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1457-0
