Judge's consideration of ronald tannur's exempt vote in the crime of murder (Study of Decision No. 454/ Pid.B/2024/PN.SBY)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59651/relae.v17i1.320Keywords:
Acquittal Decision, Murder as a Criminal Offense, Judge's ConsiderationAbstract
The purpose of this research is to examine the judge's considerations in Decision Number 454/Pid.B/2024/PN.Sby in relation to the legal conformity and the actions of the Defendant, Gregorius Ronald Tannur, as described in the facts presented during the trial. This case has sparked controversy due to the presence of substantial evidence, including witness testimonies and CCTV footage, which may indicate the Defendant’s involvement in the act of murder. Assault is defined as an act intended to torture, oppress, and ultimately cause the loss of life. It constitutes a criminal offense that involves direct physical contact with the victim's body. However, the Panel of Judges decided to acquit the Defendant of all charges during the trial. This study employs a normative legal research method and adopts a qualitative approach through statutory and case study analysis. The materials analyzed include court decisions, witness testimonies, forensic reports (visum et repertum), and relevant literature. The research explores the judicial reasoning behind the Defendant’s acquittal and assesses whether the verdict aligns with justice, particularly with regard to the rights and justice due to the victim, Dini Sera Afrianti, and her family. Overall, the findings of this study conclude that there is a discrepancy between the judge’s considerations and the Defendant’s actions toward the victim, as well as a neglect of thorough evaluation of the evidence and facts presented during the trial.
References
Buku
Hakim, L. (2020). Buku Ajar Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. deepublish.
MARPAUNG , L. (2005). ASAS - TEORI - PRAKTIK HUKUM PIDANA. SINAR GRAFIKA.
Moeljatno. (2009). ASAS - ASAS HUKUM PIDANA. RINEKA CIPTA.
Duha Artis. (2022). PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PENJATUHAN HUKUMAN TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PEMBUNUHAN BERENCANA. Jurnal Panah Hukum, 1(2).
Hakim Lukman. (2020). Buku Ajar Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana (pertama). deepublish.
Marentek Imanuel Junior. (2019). PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PEMBUNUHAN BERENCANA. Lex Crimen, VIII(11).
Marpaung Leden. (2005). ASAS - TEORI - PRAKTIK HUKUM PIDANA (Pertama).
Moeljatno. (2009). ASAS-ASAS HUKUM PIDANA.
Nuryani Sri. (2023). ANALISIS PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MEMBERIKAN PUTUSAN BEBAS DALAM PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA PEMBUNUHAN.
Pebrianto, R., Anugerah Puji Sakti, M., & Prabu Dharma, P. (2024). ANALISIS TERHADAP PUTUSAN BEBAS (VRIJSPRAAK) DALAM PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA PEMBUNUHAN (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor: 454/PID.B/2024/PN.SBY). Jurnal Hukum Perjuangan, 3(2).
Pieter, S., & Silambi, E. D. (2019). PEMBUKTIAN DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PEMBUNUHAN BERENCANA DITINJAU DARI KITAB UDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PIDANA EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL KILLING PLANNING REVIEWED FROM THE BOOK OF CRIMINAL LAWS. JURNAL RESTORATIVE JUSTICE, 3(1).
Sipayung, B., Orba Manullang, S., Kristian Siburian, H., Mulawarman, U., Samarinda, K., & Kalimantan Timur, P. (2023). Penerapan Hukuman Mati Menurut Hukum Positif di Indonesia ditinjau dari Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 7(1). https://journal.upy.ac.id/index.php/pkn/article/download/4710/2896/11987.
