Effect of Light Intensity and Duration of Light on the Fecundity and Development of the Fruit Fly Bactrocera carambolae (Diptera: Tephritidae)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59651/cceria.v15i4.45Keywords:
Light intensity, Exposure Time, Fecundity, Bactrocera carambolaeAbstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of light intensity and duration of light on the fecundity and development of the B. carambolae fruit fly. The experiment was conducted at the Pest Laboratory, Department of Plant Pests and Diseases, Faculty of Agriculture, Brawijaya University, Malang from April to July 2008. This research consisted of two experiments, namely, (1). Effect of different light intensity and length of light on fecundity and longevity of B. carambolae fruit flies (2). Effect of different light intensity and duration of light on the development of B. carambolae fruit flies. Each experiment was arranged using a factorial Randomized Block Design (RBD) consisting of 2 factors, namely light intensity with 3 levels (100 lux, 2000 lux and 3000 lux) and light duration with 4 levels (10 hours light and 14 hours dark, 12 light and 12 hours dark, 14 hours light and 10 dark, 24 hours light and 24 hours dark). The results showed that the use of a light intensity of 2000 lux with a light duration of 12 hours of light and 12 hours of darkness had a good effect on the fecundity of the B.carambolae fruit fly by 80 eggs, while the developmental yield of B.carambolae fruit fly from hatching eggs was 51.33%, The duration of the larval stage was 10.17 days, the number of pupae formed was 61 eggs, the pupal weight was 0.012 g, the pupal stage was 9.39 days long, and the number of adults formed was 53 individuals, given a light intensity of 2000 lux with 12 hours of light and 12 hours of light. dark insects, hormone manipulation techniques, for the purposes of biological control as well as research on the physiology, ecology, genetics and biology of the fruit fly.
References
Andrewartha, H. G., L.C. Birch. 1974. The Distribution and Abundance Of Animal. The University Of Chicago Press. Chicago and London. 764 hlm
Anonymous, 2002a. Pedoman Pengendalian Hama Lalat buah. Direktorat Jendral Perlindungan Bina Produksi Hortikultura Direktorat Perlindungan Hortikultura. Jakarta
Borror, D. J., C. A. Triplehorn dan N. F. Johnson. 1989. Pengenalan Pelajaran Serangga. Edisi Keenam. (Terjemahan) Gadjah Mada UniversityPress. Yogyakarta.
Calvert, J.B. 2003. Vision and Colour: Eyes and the visual sense. Available at. http://www.du.edu/~jgalvert/optics/colour.html
Carrol, L. E., A. L. Norrbom, M. J. Dollwitz, dan F. C. Thompson, 2002. Pest Fruit Flies of the World Larvae Online . http://delta-intkey.com (Verified 24 April 2008).
Djumar.1999. Entomologi Pertanian. Rineka Cipta. Jakarta. Hal 94
Drew, R.A.I dan D.L. Hancock. 1994. The Bactrocera dorsalis complex of Fruit Flies (Diptera : Tephritidae : Dacinae) in Asia. Bulletin of Entomologycal Research : Suplement Series Number 2. In Suplement 2. Departement of Prymary Industries. Australia. Hal 11-13.
Gullan, P.J. 2005. The Insect an Outline of Entomology Third Edition. Blackwell Publishing..158-161
Hendrawan, D. 2007. Pengaruh Jenis Bahan Dasar Pada Pakan Buatan Terhadap Pertumbuhan Dan Perkembangan Lalat Buah Bactrocer carambolae Drew dan Hancock (Diptera : Tephritidae). Skripsi. Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Brawijaya. Malang.
Himawan, T. 2003. Studi Populasi Lalat Buah Bactrocera dorsalis complex Pada Tanaman Mangga Dengan Pola Tanam Monokultur dan Campuran Di Jawa Timur. Disertasi. Program Pasca Sarjana Universitas Brawijaya. Malang. Hal 40-68.
Kardinan, A. 2002. Pedoman Pengendalian Hama Lalat Buah. Direktorat Jenderal Bina Produksi Hortikultura.Jakarta.
Kusmaryono. Y. 1999. Hubungan Cuaca Iklim Dengan Hama Tanaman. Materi Kuliah Online Geomet.FMIPA. IPB
Kuswadi, A.N., Darmawi dan M. Indarwatni. 1997. Biologi Lalat Buah Bactrocera carambolae dalam Biakan Di Laboratorium dengan Makanan Buatan. Pro. Seminar Nasional Biologi XV. PEI dan Univ. Lampung. Bandarlampung :1510-1514.
Putra, N.S. 1997. Hama Lalat Buah dan Pengendaliannya. Kanisius. Yogyakarta.64 hal.
Raharjo. A. P. 2008. Pengaruh Suhu Terhadap Lama Stadia Lalat Buah B.carambolae Drew dan Hancock (Diptera: Teprithidae). Skripsi. Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Brawijaya. Malang.
Raspi. A., Angelo.C., dan Augusto. L., 2005. Presence of Mature Eggs in OliveFruit Fly, Bactrocera oleae (Diptera Tephritidae), at different constant phothoperiod and at two temperature. Available at http://www.mass rearing/photoperiod/bulletin of insectology.html.
Sarwono,. Rosmahani dan Nur Imah.1990. Distribusi dan Tingkat Serangan Lalat Buah (Dacus dorsalis komplek) di beberapa sentra produksi mangga di Jawa Timur dan Bali. Penl. Hort.5 (1) : 79-84
Schward, A. Zambada, D. H. Sorozco, J. 1985. Mass Production Of The Mediterranean Fruit Fly at Metapa Mexico.Available at http://fcla.edu/florida entomology/mass production of medfly.html. Siwi, S.S. 2002. Report on Development of a Database and Upgrading of Associated Reference Speciments of Agriculturally Important Insect. Badan Litbang Pertanian-PAATP. Page 4-21.
Suputa, Cahyaniati, A. Kustaryati, Issusilaningtyas, M. Railan, W. P. Mardiasih. 2006. Pedoman Pengelolaan Hama Lalat Buah. Direktorat Perlindungan Tanaman Hortikultura. Jakarta. p 43.
Walker,G.P, 1997 . Laboratory Rearing Techniques for Tephritid Fruit Flies in Pasific Island Countries and Territories. http://www.spc.int/pacifly/fruit fly manual htm.(verified 5 april 2008).
